Реклама: пароварка philips hd
[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Ray Clark
Date: 2/9/00
Time: 10:19:25 PM
Ray M. Clark 29461 No Le Hace Dr. Fair Oaks Ranch, TX 78015
(830) 981-8940
November 4, 1999
The Honorable Henry Hyde, Chairman House Judiciary Committee 2138 Rayburn House Office Building U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
RE: United States District Court Judge Dominic J. Squatrito (Connecticut)
Dear Chairman Hyde:
Please find enclosed a copy of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States. The purpose of the presenting a copy of the petition to the House Judiciary Committee is that it contains evidence of what may be impeachable misconduct by United States District Court Judge, Dominic J. Squatrito. There is substantial and conclusive evidence from the court records that:
 Judge Squatrito, while presiding over this case, colluded with defendant At Entertainment, Inc. to defeat Justice by EX PARTE communicating with defendant At Entertainment, Inc. for the production of an application that substantially affected the merits of this case. A copy of defendant’s response to Judge Squatrito’s EX PARTE request for production of the application is enclosed as EXHIBIT “A.”
 The court records do not reflect the EX PARTE communications by and between Judge Squatrito and defendant At Entertainment, Inc. where Judge Squatrito requested the application from the defendant. Nor does the court records reflect the production of the EX PARTE application into the records even though Judge Squatrito personally accepted the EX PART application and incorporated it merits into his decision. A copy of the court records is enclosed as EXHIBIT “B.”
 Judge Squatrito, while presiding over this case, lied under color to benefit defendant At Entertainment, Inc. by denying that there was any EX PARTE communications between the court and defendant At Entertainment, Inc. A copy of Judge Squatrito’s Order denying the EX PARTE communications is enclosed as EXHIBIT “C.”
 Judge Squatrito, while presiding over this case, used his judicial power to alter the Public Records of the Connecticut District Court to benefit At Entertainment, Inc. and cover-up his illegal and/or improper actions. A copy of Judge Squatrito’s Order setting the discovery deadline to June 30, 1997, is enclosed as EXHIBIT “D.” When I filed an amended complaint to include allegations of undue prejudice by Judge Squatrito for his illegal and/or improper actions on June 10, 1997, (see exhibit “B” page 15, # 156) discovery was still open and was to remain open for another 20 days. However, Judge Squatrito altered the discovery closure date from June 30, 1997, to June 10, 1997, (see exhibit “B” page 15, # 151) to deny the motion based on the grounds that discovery had already closed. In doing so Judge Squatrito has used his judicial power to forge a public document as a means of covering-up his illegal and/or improper actions. A copy of Judge Squatrito’s Order denying my motion to amend because discovery had already closed is enclosed as EXHIBIT “E.”
I believe that by these actions the United States District Court Judge, Dominic J. Squatrito, has violated his oath of office. I believe these actions are an impeachable offense.
The United States Department of Justice is involved in this case as counsel for the States of Connecticut and New York.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________ Ray M. Clark